Can a gold company be all things to all
kinds of gold investors? Let’s hear what Goldcorp Inc. CEO Chuck Jeannes
had to say at this week’s Denver Gold Forum.
“I
think there’s a couple camps out there. One would be the group that
continues to believe very much in gold, and in the near term, thinks
gold is going up, and is very much focused on our leverage to the gold
price,” Mr. Jeannes said in kicking off Goldcorp’s investor
presentation. “I think Goldcorp is a very good choice for that camp of
investor. We’ve got growing production this year, our costs are
declining, we have zero limitations on our exposure to gold price, no
hedging, no streams on gold assets, so we give you that exposure.
“The biggest and second camp of investors
are those who continue to believe in gold, but are concerned about what
the price is going to do in the near and medium term, so you want to
minimize your risk of holding shares while you wait for the gold price
to recover – and you don’t know when that’s going to happen,” Mr.
Jeannes continued. “For that class of investor, I think Goldcorp is a
really safe choice. We’re generating free cash flow even at the current
prices and below, and we have one of the strongest balance sheets in the
business with the only BBB+ rating.”
Well
played, Mr. Jeannes, well played. But there really are two kinds of
gold companies for these two kinds of investors. And Goldcorp, with all
the attributes of safety Mr. Jeannes describes, belongs in the latter
camp. They’re the companies (Agnico Eagle Mines is another) that had the
luxury of spending a significant chunk of their investor presentations
in Denver this week on the quality of their properties and their
production numbers.
Mr. Jeannes
politely calls the other companies’ profile levered to the gold price,
but they’re the ones we can also say are burdened by peak-era
borrowings. These companies have to spend most of their presentations
talking about the properties they’ve sold, the debt they’ve retired, the
costs they’ve cut. (Hello, Barrick Gold.)
As
gold has continued its slump from 2011 highs, it’s these levered
companies who’ve hurt investors the most, and who may continue to do so
if gold keeps kicking around its bottoms. Of course, for the investors
in that first camp – looking for a sharp, near-term rebound – the worst
performers are the best options.
“There
is an irony in this sector,” Adrian Day, a keynote speaker, said. “When
you have a very strong market, particularly at the beginning of a very
strong market, sometimes what we might objectively think of as the worst
companies, the ones with the highest debt levels, the ones with the
most marginal properties, are precisely the stocks that do the best,”
said the CEO and chairman of Maryland-based Adrian Day Asset Management,
a long-time advocate of precious metals stocks. “And so, you can be a
pair trader and buy something that’s a very good company and sell short a
very bad company. And if you have a very strong move in gold, you
suddenly find that your bad company has outperformed the good one.”
Of
course, no one wants to be seen as a bad company, and the presentations
this week in Denver showed a refreshing realism. As we’ve detailed, the
message from miners over the years has taken a journey from the “gold
bug” days when equity investors cared more about the price of bullion
than the performance of the companies pulling gold from the ground. As
ordinary investors began to buy into the sector, miners began to talk
about return on capital cash flow, and dividends.
That
was at $1,700 (U.S.) per ounce. At Friday’s close of $1,145.60, down
$8.20, companies have instead honed their message to pitch investors on
their survival instincts. “Disciplined” was an exceptionally popular
adjective in the presentations, such as Newcrest Mining Ltd.’s reference
to itself as “disciplined cost managers.”
A
trip to the table that held the old-fashioned printouts of company
presentations revealed that Alacer Gold Corp. is a “low-cost producer
with growth,” while the Sierra Metals Inc. handout says it’s a “low-cost
producer with exciting growth potential.” Right next to it, Dundee
Precious Metals Inc. is “building a low-cost gold producer,” which
suggests it may not be quite low-cost just yet. (Royalty company
Franco-Nevada, which paces the industry in shareholder return, stuck a
thumb in everyone’s eyes with the title “the gold investment that
works,” i.e., all the others don’t work all that well.)
Keynote
speeches at the Denver Gold Forum have often featured aggressive bulls
on gold prices such as Franco-Nevada’s Pierre Lassonde (2012) or Martin
Murenbeeld, the chief economist of Dundee Capital Markets (2014). This
year the forum brought Jeffrey Christian, managing partner of
commodity-focused CPM Group.
Mr.
Christian is a long-term bull – he sees gold prices moving “sharply
higher” in the long term, with strong demand from investors and central
banks as mine production falls. But for the next two years, he says,
there may be “relatively weak” gold prices, with no financial or
economic crises stimulating demand and continuing mine production. By
the numbers: the CPM forecast sees gold prices remaining below $1,300 an
ounce through 2019.
Meanwhile, the new
reality is also creeping into company presentations. Where miners, as
recently as a year ago, seemed reluctant to present scenarios where gold
traded consistently below $1,200, Barrick presented a slide this week
showing what it would do not only at $1,000 an ounce, but also $900.
(Measures such as part or full suspensions of production at non-core
mines, more head count cuts and changes in stripping and processing.) To
be clear, Barrick is not predicting $900 gold, just selling itself as a
survivor if things get worse. But are the people who believe that
listening?
Let’s return to Mr. Jeannes:
“I
suppose there’s a third class of investor out there who thinks gold is
going down and is staying down,” he said. “I’m not too worried about
that guy, because they’re not [at the Denver Gold Forum] this year
anyway. I think that would account for the [8 per cent] lower
year-on-year attendance.”