Posts mit dem Label Derivate werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Derivate werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Freitag, 30. September 2016

Beginnt der Run auf die Deutsche Bank?

Hierzu ein aktueller Bericht von Zerohedge, der auf die Ereignisse von gestern eingeht:

The Run Begins: Deutsche Bank Hedge Fund Clients Withdraw Excess Cash

Deutsche Bank concerns just went to '11' as Bloomberg reports a number of funds that clear derivatives trades with Deutsche Bank AG have withdrawn some excess cash and positions held at the lender, a sign of counterparties’ mounting concerns about doing business with Europe’s largest investment bank.

While the vast majority of Deutsche Bank’s more than 200 derivatives-clearing clients have made no changes, some funds that use the bank’s prime brokerage service have moved part of their listed derivatives holdings to other firms this week, according to an internal bank document seen by Bloomberg News..

Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-29/run-begins-deutsche-bank-hedge-fund-clients-cut-collateral-exposure

Montag, 19. September 2016

Deutsche Bank: Kapitalsorgen nehmen weiter zu, Wahrscheinlichkeit einer neuen Kapitalerhöhung wächst

Der Krisenmodus bei der angeschlagenen Deutsche Bank (DB) setzt sich ungebrochen fort..

Capital worries grow for Deutsche Bank

Sep 19 2016, 09:08 ET | About: Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | By: Stephen Alpher, SA News Editor
  • Shares plunged late last week after word leaked the U.S. is seeking $14B over crisis-era MBS dealings, and they're extending those losses today as analysts crunch the bank's capital numbers.
  • Any settlement above $6B would suggest a capital raise would be necessary just to pay the fine, says SocGen's Andrew Lim, noting Deutsche (NYSE:DB) has only about $12B in legal reserves and is still facing other probes.
  • Macquarie's Piers Brown says the bank's capital position is "precariously thin" even without bad litigation outcomes, although a sale of Postbank could ease that pressure a bit.
  • JPMorgan says a U.S. settlement in the $3B-$3.5B range would leave Deutsche will the necessary room to settle other cases without a capital raise. For each $1B over that range, litigation costs would erode capital by 24 basis points.
Quelle: seekingalpha.com


Quote:

Deutsche Bank Extends Losses Near Record Lows: "Significantly Undercapitalzied... Even Without Bad Outcomes"

Things are going from worse to worst once again for Deutsche Bank as equity and credit markets deteriorate further as analysts warn Germany's biggest (and the world's most systemically dangerous) bank would be "significantly undercapitalized" even if an eventual settlement with the DoJ can be covered by the bank's reserves. Despite multiple capital raises over the past few years, as Bloomberg notes, any likely settlement would imply a capital increase - just to pay the fine..





Sonntag, 5. Juli 2015

Wie JPMorgan im Rohstoffmarkt: Citigroup cornered Edelmetall-Derivatemarkt

Die einflussreichen Big Player der amerikanischen Finanzindustrie lassen mal wieder die Muskeln spielen.

JPMorgan übernimmt quasi im Alleingang das Ruder im riesigen Rohstoff-Derivatemarkt, während Citi nun den Edelmetall-Derivatemarkt kräftig aufwirbelt..

Citigroup Just Cornered The "Precious Metals" Derivatives Market

Tyler Durden's picture


 
One week ago, when we scoured through the latest OCC quarterly derivative report (in which we find that the top FDIC insured 4 US banks continue to account for over 90%, or $185.5 trillion of all outstanding derivatives which as of March 31 amounted to $203 trillion; nothing new here), we found something fascinating: based on the OCC's derivative update, JPM had literally cornered the commodity derivatives complex, when from "just" $226 billion in total Commodity exposure, JPM's notional soared by 1,690% in one quarter to $4 trillion, or about 96% of total..
..
However, another big question remains: just what is Citigroup - not, not JPMorgan - with the Precious Metals category.
Here is the chart showing Citigroup's Precious Metals (mostly silver now that gold is lumped in with FX), exposure over the past 4 years. Of note: the 1260% increase in Precious Metals derivative holdings in the past quarter, from just $3.9 billion to $53 billion!

Quelle: zerohedge.com


Quelle: zerohedge.com

Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015

JPMorgan manipuliert erneut im großen Stil den Rohstoff-Derivate-Markt

Aktuelles Update von Zerohedge mit großartigen Charts und Einblicken:

JPMorgan Just Cornered The Commodity Derivative Market, And This Time There Is Proof

Tyler Durden's picture




For years there had been speculation, rumor and hearsay that JPM had cornered the US commodities market. Now, finally, we have documented proof.
* * *
Traditionally, we look at the OCC's Quarterly Bank Report on derivatives activities to see which was the largest bank in the US in terms of total notional derivative holdings. The reason being that like on frequent occasions in the past, we find some stunning  results, such asmost recently in January when we wrote that, for the first time, Citigroup had eclipsed JPM as the largest US bank in total derivatives, with just over $70 trillion compared to perennial megabank JPM's $65.3 trillion as of the third quarter of 2014, explaining also why Citigroup had drafted the Swaps push out language in the Omnibus Bill..


Sonntag, 28. September 2014

Abhängigkeit und implizierte Systemrelevanz der größten US-Banken steigt auf neues Allzeithoch

Lesenswerter Beitrag hierzu von ZH:


5 U.S. Banks Each Have More Than 40 Trillion Dollars In Exposure To Derivatives

Tyler Durden's picture




When is the U.S. banking system going to crash?  I can sum it up in three words.  Watch the derivatives.  It used to be only four, but now there are five "too big to fail" banks in the United States that each have more than 40 trillion dollars in exposure to derivatives.  Today, the U.S. national debt is sitting at a grand total of about 17.7 trillion dollars, so when we are talking about 40 trillion dollars we are talking about an amount of money that is almost unimaginable.  And unlike stocks and bonds, these derivatives do not represent "investments" in anything.  They can be incredibly complex, but essentially they are just paper wagers about what will happen in the future.  The truth is that derivatives trading is not too different from betting on baseball or football games.  Trading in derivatives is basically just a form of legalized gambling, and the "too big to fail" banks have transformed Wall Street into the largest casino in the history of the planet.  When this derivatives bubble bursts (and as surely as I am writing this it will), the pain that it will cause the global economy will be greater than words can describe.
If derivatives trading is so risky, then why do our big banks do it?
The answer to that question comes down to just one thing.
Greed.
The "too big to fail" banks run up enormous profits from their derivatives trading.  According to the New York Times, U.S. banks "have nearly $280 trillion of derivatives on their books" even though the financial crisis of 2008 demonstrated how dangerous they could be...
American banks have nearly $280 trillion of derivatives on their books, and they earn some of their biggest profits from trading in them. But the 2008 crisis revealed how flaws in the market had allowed for dangerous buildups of risk at large Wall Street firms and worsened the run on the banking system.
The big banks have sophisticated computer models which are supposed to keep the system stable and help them manage these risks.
But all computer models are based on assumptions.
And all of those assumptions were originally made by flesh and blood people.
When a "black swan event" comes along such as a war, a major pandemic, an apocalyptic natural disaster or a collapse of a very large financial institution, these models can often break down very rapidly.
For example, the following is a brief excerpt from a Forbes article that describes what happened to the derivatives market when Lehman Brothers collapsed back in 2008...
Fast forward to the financial meltdown of 2008 and what do we see? America again was celebrating. The economy was booming. Everyone seemed to be getting wealthier, even though the warning signs were everywhere: too much borrowing, foolish investments, greedy banks, regulators asleep at the wheel, politicians eager to promote home-ownership for those who couldn’t afford it, and distinguished analysts openly predicting this could only end badly. And then, when Lehman Bros fell, the financial system froze and world economy almost collapsed. Why?

The root cause wasn’t just the reckless lending and the excessive risk taking. The problem at the core was a lack of transparency. After Lehman’s collapse, no one could understand any particular bank’s risks from derivative trading and so no bank wanted to lend to or trade with any other bank. Because all the big banks’ had been involved to an unknown degree in risky derivative trading, no one could tell whether any particular financial institution might suddenly implode.
After the last financial crisis, we were promised that this would be fixed.
But instead the problem has become much larger.
When the housing bubble burst back in 2007, the total notional value of derivatives contracts around the world had risen to about 500 trillion dollars.
According to the Bank for International Settlements, today the total notional value of derivatives contracts around the world has ballooned to a staggering 710 trillion dollars ($710,000,000,000,000).
And of course the heart of this derivatives bubble can be found on Wall Street.
What I am about to share with you is very troubling information.
I have shared similar numbers in the past, but for this article I went and got the very latest numbers from the OCC's most recent quarterly report.  As I mentioned above, there are now five "too big to fail" banks that each have more than 40 trillion dollars in exposure to derivatives...
JPMorgan Chase

Total Assets: $2,476,986,000,000 (about 2.5 trillion dollars)

Total Exposure To Derivatives: $67,951,190,000,000 (more than 67 trillion dollars)

Citibank

Total Assets: $1,894,736,000,000 (almost 1.9 trillion dollars)

Total Exposure To Derivatives: $59,944,502,000,000 (nearly 60 trillion dollars)

Goldman Sachs

Total Assets: $915,705,000,000 (less than a trillion dollars)

Total Exposure To Derivatives: $54,564,516,000,000 (more than 54 trillion dollars)

Bank Of America

Total Assets: $2,152,533,000,000 (a bit more than 2.1 trillion dollars)

Total Exposure To Derivatives: $54,457,605,000,000 (more than 54 trillion dollars)

Morgan Stanley

Total Assets: $831,381,000,000 (less than a trillion dollars)

Total Exposure To Derivatives: $44,946,153,000,000 (more than 44 trillion dollars)
And it isn't just U.S. banks that are engaged in this type of behavior.
As Zero Hedge recently detailed, German banking giant Deutsche Bank has more exposure to derivatives than any of the American banks listed above...
Deutsche has a total derivative exposure that amounts to €55 trillion or just about $75 trillion. That’s a trillion with a T, and is about 100 times greater than the €522 billion in deposits the bank has. It is also 5x greater than the GDP of Europe and more or less the same as the GDP of… the world.
For those looking forward to the day when these mammoth banks will collapse, you need to keep in mind that when they do go down the entire system is going to utterly fall apart.
At this point our economic system is so completely dependent on these banks that there is no way that it can function without them.
It is like a patient with an extremely advanced case of cancer.
Doctors can try to kill the cancer, but it is almost inevitable that the patient will die in the process.
The same thing could be said about our relationship with the "too big to fail" banks.  If they fail, so do the rest of us.
We were told that something would be done about the "too big to fail" problem after the last crisis, but it never happened.
In fact, as I have written about previously, the "too big to fail" banks have collectively gotten 37 percent larger since the last recession.
At this point, the five largest banks in the country account for 42 percent of all loans in the United States, and the six largest banks control 67 percent of all banking assets.
If those banks were to disappear tomorrow, we would not have much of an economy left.
But as you have just read about in this article, they are being more reckless than ever before.
We are steamrolling toward the greatest financial disaster in world history, and nobody is doing much of anything to stop it.
Things could have turned out very differently, but now we will reap the consequences for the very foolish decisions that we have made..

Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2014

Bankenkrise, Lehman Brothers 2.0: Die Fortsetzung in Vorbereitung?

Während die Aktienmärkte weiter nahe den Allzeithochs notieren, schwächeln die Kurse von ein paar Großbanken schon seit einigen Monaten bedenklich.

Imho ist es nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis ein Big Player der Finanzbranche den Weg von Lehman Brothers folgen wird.

Gut zu wissen und sehr beruhigend, dass weiterhin alle Großbanken in den USA, Europa und Asien unter dem Strich (d.h. wenn es wieder richtig ernst wird) "too big to fail" und damit systemrelevant sind.

Es liegt sogar sehr nahe, dass die irrwitzige "Systemrelevanz" noch viel größer geworden ist, als in der "letzten" Finanz- und Bankenkrise. Man schaue sich nur die Balance Sheets der Großbanken an, den generellen Leverage und die historische Menge an Liquidität, welche global durch die Finanzbranche zirkuliert..

Und die Notenbanken als "Lender of the last resort" sind ja auch ganz dick im Aktienmarkt und vielen anderen "Märkten" engagiert.

Man muss nur Vertrauen in die Großbanken und die Finanzbranche inkl. den Notenbanken haben, davon können bspw. gerade etliche Barclays-Klienten ein Lied singen, nicht?

Das geht alles ganz, ganz sicher gut aus, wir wissen ja.. "Solange die Musik spielt,.."

#lehman2.0 #bankingcrisis2.0 #beprepared #tilltheend #bigpicture


Barclays Crashes To 18-Month Lows
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/26/2014 11:48 -0400 - Barclays ETC 
First, it was gold manipulation and now alleged equity market rigging; it seems investors (and customers) have finally had enough. Barclays stock price is down over 8% today and trading back at 18 month lows. Of course, we will hear that this is the kitchen sink quarter etc... "remember the London Whale" but the trail of alleged fraud (and the damning emails) suggests catching this falling knife is anything but a "no brainer"...

Quelle: zerohedge.com


The Elephant In The Room: Deutsche Bank's $75 Trillion In Derivatives Is 20 Times Greater Than German GDP
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/28/2014 14:56 -0400
It is perhaps supremely ironic that the last time we did an in depth analysis of Deutsche Bank's financial situation was precisely a year ago, when the largest bank in Europe (and according to some, the world), stunned its investors with a 10% equity dilution. Why the capital raise if everything was as peachy as the ECB promised it had been? It turned out, nothing was peachy, and in fact DB would proceed to undergo a massive balance sheet deleveraging campaign over the next year, in which it would quietly dispose of all the ugly stuff on its balance sheet during the relentless Fed and BOJ-inspired "dash for trash" rally in a way not to spook investors about everything else that may be beneath the Deutsche covers..
Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-28/elephant-room-deutsche-banks-75-trillion-derivatives-20-times-greater-german-gdp




Quelle: zerohedge.com





Quote:

Quelle: http://www.rottmeyer.de



Quelle: http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Lehman-Bros-Holdings-Inc.png

Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014

Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014

Edelmetall-Derivate: JP Morgan behält dominante Rolle

Die folgenden Charts spiegeln sehr prägnant wider wer den Derivate(/Papier)-Markt in der Edelmetall- und insbesondere Gold-Branche fest im Griff hat:


OCC Gold Derivatives All Maturities
Quelle: sharelynx.com


OCC Silver, Palladium, Plagtinum Derivatives All Maturities
Quelle: sharelynx.com


Aggregate Precious Metal Derivatives
 Quelle: sharelynx.com

Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013

Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013

Gold - WGC Q1 2013 Trends Report: Physische vs. Papier-Nachfrage

Heute veröffentlichte das World Gold Council (WGC) den Gold Demand Trends Report für das 1. Quartal 2013. Ein starker Anstieg der physischen Nachfrage aus Asien steht einem massiven Einbruch am Derivatemarkt (ETFs/ETPs) gegenüber. Informatives Review mit prägnanten Charts, das hier zum Download bereit steht:


Quelle: WGC Q1 2013 Demand Trends Report (gold.org)


Quelle: zerohedge.com

Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013

Gold: Physischer Markt vs. ETF-Papiermarkt

Im April steht ein Rekordabfluss auf der Derivateseite (GLD/SPDR/ETPs) einem Multi-Jahreshoch bei den physichen US-Verkäufen (American Eagles) gegenüber. 

Im vergangenen Monat verlor das wichtigste, globale Gold-ETF (GLD) ca. 142 Tonnen Gold mit einem Gegenwert von rund 6,6 Mrd. USD. Dieser Outflow entspricht dem größten Monatsabfluss seit Auflegung des ETFs in 2004. Währenddessen stiegen die US-Münzenverkäufe in den ersten 4 Monaten in 2013 auf 502.000 Unzen an, was einer Steigerung von über 325% gegenüber dem Vorjahr entspricht.

Die Divergenz zwischen dem physischen Goldmarkt und dem ETF-Papiermarkt hat sich seit Jahresanfang kontinuierlich erhöht und erreicht im April ein neues Level. 

Gold ETF posts record outflow in April, US coin sales spike
In April, the SPDR Gold Trust posted a record monthly outflow in tonnage terms, by contrast, sales of American Eagle gold coins rose to their highest monthly tally since Dec 2009..
Link: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/05/01/gold-etf-coin-idUKL2N0DI1R720130501?feedType=RSS&feedName=rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews


Auf Tagesbasis erreichten die Verkäufe bei den US-Goldmünzen im April sogar Rekordniveaus:

Quelle: zerohedge.com